Source: NYT
Source: Philly News
The Roman Catholic Church has forgiven the Beatles more than 40 years after John Lennon claimed the band were “more popular than Jesus”.Some quotes that got Lennon in trouble:
“After so many years it sounds merely like the boasting of an English working-class lad struggling to cope with unexpected success,” an editorial in today’s (November 22nd) edition of the Vatican’s official newspaper said.
L'Osservatore Romano, regarded as the Pope’s mouthpiece, praised the Beatles, saying the Liverpool band had provided the world with some of the “best pages in modern pop music”.
"It will vanish and shrink. We're more popular than Jesus now - I don't know which will go first, rock and roll or Christianity”And:
“Jesus was alright, but his disciples were thick and ordinary. It's them twisting it that ruins it for me."Source: Gigwise
"The Bush administration will leave us with another legacy: unqualified Republican ideologues receiving appointments in various institutions, including scientific organizations, as their ship of state sinks. The rats are scuttling overboard, and are being rewarded with captaincies on any available vessel."This is Bush. Let's be real. He must have hated science when he was in grade school and wants the world to pay for his inconvenient low intellect.
An example would be:The president of the nation's largest general science organization yesterday sharply criticized recent cases of Bush administration political appointees gaining permanent federal jobs with responsibility for making or administering scientific policies, saying the result would be "to leave wreckage behind."
"It's ludicrous to have people who do not have a scientific background, who are not trained and skilled in the ways of science, make decisions that involve resources, that involve facilities in the scientific infrastructure," said James McCarthy, a Harvard University oceanographer who is president of the American Association for the Advancement of Science. "You'd just like to think people have more respect for the institution of government than to leave wreckage behind with these appointments."
1. Mr. Obama, if the biggest terrorist attack ever on American soil were to take place while you're president, would you:Read on: Ten Questions That Must Be Asked of Obama Before He's Sworn In - 236.com
A) Finish the children's book you're currently reading.
B) Do something.
2. Mr. Obama, if a major American city were to go under water, would you:
A) Fly over the city and wave to the drowning people below.
B) Do something.
It's an interesting definition of "victory." I guess you can define victory as more than 4,000 American fatalities, more than 30,000 wounded, probably hundreds of thousands of Iraqi deaths, millions of Iraqis displaced, $1-$3 trillion in costs to the U.S. economy, an empowered Iran, an un-addressed threat in Afghanistan, and massive damage to America's image around the world. All for a war that did not actually achieve its original objectives - eliminate a WMD threat that wasn't there, eliminate a terrorism threat that wasn't there, and spread democracy throughout the Middle East. I guess we can define "victory" that way. Probably wouldn't be my definition though."Reminds me of the "consequences of catastrophic success" Bush quote.
"There is, however, another and more disturbing parallel between 2008 and 1932 — namely, the emergence of a power vacuum at the height of the crisis. The interregnum of 1932-1933, the long stretch between the election and the actual transfer of power, was disastrous for the U.S. economy, at least in part because the outgoing administration had no credibility, the incoming administration had no authority and the ideological chasm between the two sides was too great to allow concerted action. And the same thing is happening now....The Bush Legacy, it’s scary to think how much more can go wrong before Inauguration Day.
How much can go wrong in the two months before Mr. Obama takes the oath of office? The answer, unfortunately, is: a lot. Consider how much darker the economic picture has grown since the failure of Lehman Brothers, which took place just over two months ago. And the pace of deterioration seems to be accelerating.
Most obviously, we’re in the midst of the worst stock market crash since the Great Depression: the Standard & Poor’s 500-stock index has now fallen more than 50 percent from its peak. Other indicators are arguably even more disturbing: unemployment claims are surging, manufacturing production is plunging, interest rates on corporate bonds — which reflect investor fears of default — are soaring, which will almost surely lead to a sharp fall in business spending. The prospects for the economy look much grimmer now than they did as little as a week or two ago."
"Beleaguered pop star Michael Jackson has converted to Islam and changed his name to Mikaeel, it has been claimed today.
The 50-year-old singer, who has previously been photographed wearing a traditional Arab women's veil, reportedly became a Muslim in a ceremony at a friend's house in Los Angeles.
The singer, who was raised as a Jehovah's Witness, is said to have sat on the floor and worn a small hat while an imam officiated at the home of Steve Porcaro, who composed music on his Thriller album."
Looking for a bargain? How about $74,100 for a share of Berkshire Hathaway? That’s the cheapest stock in Warren Buffett’s company has cost since 2003, down 51 percent since an all-time high of $151,650 in December.Put me down for .01% of one share.
"John Ziegler is a shining example of such a conservative. During my interview with him, Ziegler made absolutely no effort to persuade me about the veracity of any of his viewpoints. He simply asserted them -- and then became frustrated, paranoid, or vulgar when I rebutted them."Noting that Ziegler got his start in radio, Silver noted the origins of talking without being held accountable:
"Moreover, almost uniquely to radio, most of the audience is not even paying attention to you, because most people listen to radio when they're in the process of doing something else."And if you're going to ramble on the airwaves you need to keep your audience fired up. And how do you do this? Silver notes that it's about stimulation, rather than persuading someone with debate or facts:
"The McCain campaign was all about stimulation. The Britney Spears ads weren't persuasive, but they sure were stimulating! "Drill, baby, drill" wasn't persuasive, but it sure was stimulating! Sarah Palin wasn't persuasive, but she sure was stimulating!"And who is better at stimulating than Fox?
"FOX News is unusual television, really, in that almost all the stimulation is verbal, and almost all of it occurs at the same staccato pacing as radio. You could take tonight's broadcast of Hannity & Colmes or the Factor and put it directly on radio and you'd lose almost nothing (not coincidentally, Hannity and O'Reilly also have highly-rated radio programs). That wouldn't really work for Countdown, which has higher production values, and where the pacing is more irregular. It certainly wouldn't work for the Situation Room -- or moving in a different direction, the Daily Show."The Republican echo chamber is unique and powerful. Talking points are repeated with loyalty. The problem is America has moved forward:
"The failures of the Bush administration have woken the country up; conservatives now need to find a way to communicate with people who are actually paying attention."One of my favorite bloggers, Oliver Willis, writes about his experience with conservatives and their "perception of reality":
"I experienced this myself in conversation with one of my regular conservative readers who argued with me that Barack Obama running ads attacking Sarah Palin over abortion was a sign of weakness… for Obama. The problem is that the Democratic position on abortion - access with restrictions - is far closer to the mainstream of American thought than Sarah Palin’s - the outright banning of abortion. But if you watched Fox News and listened to talk radio you would think just the opposite.If this were any other topic, let's say sports, and you were as wrong as the Conservatives have been with reflecting the thoughts and attitudes of America, you would have been fired years ago.
I also noticed it on con blogs and Free Republic when the polls all indicated that Sen. Obama was headed for a significant victory over McCain. It wasn’t that the campaign was being run poorly or that Obama was doing well. Nope, the polls showing Obama in the lead were clearly a sinister plot by the liberal mainstream media to convince the American people to vote for Obama (or, because the pollsters were in blue states their results couldn’t possibly be accurate). That’s crazy talk, and yet it was a mainstream point of view for the right - reinforced by their media. It’s a lot like people in a cult who simply can’t step out of their cult-world and review things objectively."