The first formal debate for the 2012 GOP presidential candidates was scheduled for May 2, which is less than five weeks away. However, with no credible candidates having actually launched campaigns, the event has been moved to September 14.
Obama 2012!
(Source: washingtonmonthly.com)
Wednesday, March 30, 2011
No Republican Candidates, First GOP Debate Moved
Tea Party "Movement" Inceasingly Unpopular
CNN has a new poll out showing their highest-ever level of unfavorable views for the Tea Party movement. According to the poll, 47 percent of Americans now have an unfavorable view of the Tea Party, as compared to 32 percent with a favorable one.
Let’s keep this simple: is the poll some sort of outlier or part of a trend?
In the chart below, I’ve plotted all polls from the PollingReport.com database that asked people for their impressions on the Tea Party, and then plotted a smoothed regression line on top of them. Favorable or positive views are shown in blue; unfavorable or negative ones in red.
The trend looks reasonably clear: unfavorable views are on the rise. Although the CNN poll may have exaggerated them slightly, they now register at about 44 percent, according to the trendline.
Bereft of ideas, this scapegoating demagogic movement of know-nothings will be relegated to the trash heap of history.
In the past it took longer and more damage was done. Americans are finally learning quicker.
Wednesday, March 23, 2011
Americans Support Obama
Americans support Obama’s reelection over generic GOP candidate by 10 points. #hope
Fetal Attractions
"Pro-life conservatives are obsessed with the fetus from conception to nine months. After that, they don’t want to know about you. They don’t want to hear from you. No nothing. No neonatal care, no day care, no head start, no school lunch, no food stamps, no welfare, no nothing. If you’re preborn, you’re fine; if you’re preschool, you’re fucked. Conservatives don’t give a shit about you until you reach ‘military age’. Then they think you are just fine. Just what they’ve been looking for. Conservatives want live babies so they can raise them to be dead soldiers. Pro-life… pro-life… These people aren’t pro-life, they’re killing doctors! What kind of pro-life is that? What, they’ll do anything they can to save a fetus but if it grows up to be a doctor they just might have to kill it? They’re not pro-life. You know what they are? They’re anti-woman. Simple as it gets, anti-woman. They don’t like them. They don’t like women."George Carlin
Control over women is paramount for the pro-fetus sect.
If Only Republicans Followed Reagan Now
"Where free unions and collective bargaining are forbidden, freedom is lost!"Ronald Reagan, Labor Day 1980
Of course, democrats are too polite to bring that up…
Monday, March 21, 2011
Larry Kudlow Solidifies Wall St Scumbag Role
“The human toll here looks to be much worse than the economic toll and we can be grateful for that.”
— CNBC host LARRY KUDLOW, the day the earthquake and tsunami struck Japan, March 11, 2011.
He later apologized. On Twitter.
via tumblr.com
Money rules everything. Zero emotion, zero empathy, zero sensitivity, zero humanity.
How Dumb Are We?
Newsweek is the latest major outlet to poll Americans on some basics of American history and civics. As the headline suggests -- "How dumb are we?" -- the public didn't do especially well when tested. (thanks to R.K. for the tip)
They're the sort of scores that drive high-school history teachers to drink. When NEWSWEEK recently asked 1,000 U.S. citizens to take America's official citizenship test, 29 percent couldn't name the vice president. Seventy-three percent couldn't correctly say why we fought the Cold War. Forty-four percent were unable to define the Bill of Rights. And 6 percent couldn't even circle Independence Day on a calendar.
Going through the results, some of Newsweek's findings were more discouraging than others. An overwhelming majority, for example, can't name one of the writers of the Federalist Papers, but that's hardly surprising. Similar numbers don't know how many U.S. House members there are, who was president during World War I, or the precise number of amendments to the U.S. Constitution.
All things considered, though, these results don't strike me as especially outrageous, and even the questions don't seem especially relevant. I'm generally far more concerned about what Americans know about current events than historical events, though regrettably, we didn't do too well on these questions, either.
But the point here is not to just laugh at an uninformed electorate. Rather, the point is that this ignorance matters. Newsweek's report added that the world is "becoming more and more inhospitable to incurious know-nothings -- like us."
For more than two centuries, Americans have gotten away with not knowing much about the world around them. But times have changed -- and they've changed in ways that make civic ignorance a big problem going forward. While isolationism is fine in an isolated society, we can no longer afford to mind our own business. What happens in China and India (or at a Japanese nuclear plant) affects the autoworker in Detroit; what happens in the statehouse and the White House affects the competition in China and India. Before the Internet, brawn was enough; now the information economy demands brains instead. And where we once relied on political institutions (like organized labor) to school the middle classes and give them leverage, we now have nothing. "The issue isn't that people in the past knew a lot more and know less now," says [Jacob] Hacker. "It's that their ignorance was counterbalanced by denser political organizations."
And with that ignorance comes consequences, as uninformed and easily-fooled voters have a severely limited working understanding of current events, but at the same time, have enormous power over the nation's future.
The standard response is that people are busy, and I get that. But as Isaac Chotiner persuasively argued a while back, "[W]hen you live in a democracy, there are very few good excuses for not having minimal knowledge about what is going on in the world. How much newspaper reading would it have taken to realize that between 1992 and 1996 the deficit decreased? Or to realize that Saddam did not have a hand in 9/11? Now ask yourself how much time the average American spends watching mediocre television. Voters can choose to be ignorant or disinterested, but that choice is fundamentally their own."
The problem goes beyond voters rewarding the wrong candidates or parties; ignorance undermines the entire process. When voters are ignorant, candidates are more likely to lie, confident in their ability to get away with it. When the electorate is disengaged, policymakers feel less pressure to exercise good judgment, knowing they can just pull the wool over the public's eyes later.
I'm obviously engaged in politics, and if you're reading this, you are too. Not everyone shares our interests, and that's fine. But many Americans make time for the things they find important. They spent time watching sports, or keeping up on celebrities, or whatever. And while it would be the height of arrogance to suggest the public change its leisure habits, our political system -- and the country overall -- relies on a certain level of sophistication among the public, and there's ample evidence that we're just not at that level.
In human history, it's never been easier to get -- and stay -- well informed. Folks just have to take some responsibility.
—Steve Benen
Trickle-up FAIL
Trickle-up economics
Creating wealth is not hard when you have so many incentives given to you and exploiting cheap labor is your guiding principle. At what point is crushing your fellow man to get an advantage counter to everything moral in your life?
“Mandacious bonus junkies” or “avaricious profit cannibals”?
Sam Harris, on Japan Tsunami and god
"Either God can do nothing to stop catastrophes like this, or he doesn’t care to, or he doesn’t exist. God is either impotent, evil, or imaginary. Take your pick, and choose wisely.
The only sense to make of tragedies like this is that terrible things can happen to perfectly innocent people. This understanding inspires compassion.
Religious faith, on the other hand, erodes compassion. Thoughts like, “this might be all part of God’s plan,” or “there are no accidents in life,” or “everyone on some level gets what he or she deserves” – these ideas are not only stupid, they are extraordinarily callous. They are nothing more than a childish refusal to connect with the suffering of other human beings. It is time to grow up and let our hearts break at moments like this."
- Sam Harris
Sunday, March 20, 2011
Saturday, March 19, 2011
Friday, March 18, 2011
Serious Enough To Kill
Tokyo Electric Power Company Managing Director Akio Komiri weeps as Japanese officials finally admit that radiation leak is serious enough to kill people.
Things keep getting more real.
The 400 Richest Americans Are Now Richer Than the Bottom 50 Percent Combined
On Wednesday we told you that a rather shocking number of American politicians aren't much like most Americans at all, pulling in six-figure salaries to add to their existing seven-figure fortunes. Today, thanks to some quick math by the documentary filmmaker Michael Moore, there's another way to look at how rich our leaders are compared to the rest of the country: In 2009, if you were to add up the total fortune of America's richest 400 people, that amount—$1.27 trillion—would be more than the holdings of the bottom 50 percent of Americans, less than $1.22 trillion.By contrast, in 2007 the bottom 50% of U.S. households owned slightly more wealth than the Forbes 400; the economic meltdown has hurt the bottom more than the top. (And in fact, in 2010 the net worth of the Forbes 400 jumped to $1.37 trillion.)
That top 400, by the way, represents .0000035 percent of all households in the United States.
Granted, many of the nation's top earners, including Bill Gates and Warren Buffett, contribute a tremendous amount of their wealth to charity each year, and will continue to do so. But many others, like Charles and David Koch, who contribute to a wide range of right-wing causes, are also actively fighting to weaken working-class rights (as they did in the recent Wisconsin union fracas).
On top of all this, it's worth mentioning that, of the 25 richest Americans, just three are women, and none is a person of color.
via good.is
400 people have more than 150,000,000 people combined.
A purely CAPITALIST society is (in many respects) a purely EVIL one.
Anti-Union Bill Blocked In WI
About two weeks ago, under procedurally awkward circumstances, Wisconsin Republicans rammed through Gov. Scott Walker's (R) union-busting proposal. Almost immediately, critics argued, among other things, that the process violated the state's open-meeting laws.
Today, a Wisconsin judge, at least for now, agreed.
Dane County Circuit Judge Maryann Sumi issued a temporary restraining order Friday, barring the publication of Gov. Scott Walker's law that would sharply curtail collective bargaining for public employees.
Sumi's order will prevent Secretary of State Doug La Follette from publishing the law -- and allowing it to take effect -- until she can rule on the merits of the case. Dane County District Attorney Ismael Ozanne is seeking to block the law because he says a legislative committee violated the state's open meetings law in passing the measure, which Walker signed on Friday.
Sumi said Ozanne was likely to succeed on the merits.
"It seems to me the public policy behind effective enforcement of the open meeting law is so strong that it does outweigh the interest, at least at this time, which may exist in favor of sustaining the validity of the (law)," she said.
In the meantime, CNN's professional moron Erick Erickson has argued, "If the judge in Wisconsin wants to play, the GOP should impeach her and up the ante."
Impeach her for what?
Different day, Republicans are still dicks.
Wednesday, March 16, 2011
Disparity Over Time
God bless the USA…
Disparity of Wealth
In 1933, the wealthiest one percent of the population held 33.3 percent of the wealth. In 1974, the wealthiest one percent held 19.9 percent of the wealth.
In 2007, the wealthiest one percent held 65.4 percent of the wealth.In 1933, the bottom 90 percent held 66.7 percent of the wealth.
In 1974, the bottom 90 percent held 80.1 percent of the wealth.
In 2007, the bottom 90 percent held 34.6 percent of the wealth.Federal Tax Rates (after custom-made individual deductions)
1974 Capital gains tax rate: 35 percent
1950 Highest marginal tax rate: 90 percent2005 Capital gains tax rate: 15 percent
2005 Highest marginal tax rate: 34 percentAverage Real Income Change 1973-2000
Average real income of bottom 90 percent: -7 percent
Average real income of top 1 percent: + 148 percent
Average real income of top 0.1 percent: + 343 percent
[4]
Average Amount of Wealth Held by Persons: 2009 CensusSingle Black Women: $100
Single Hispanic Women: $120
All White Men: $43,800
All White Women: $41,500
All Black Men: $7,900Amount of Wealth Held by Families: 2009 Census
1986 Black Family Wealth: $2,000
2009 Black Family Wealth: $5,000
1986 White Family Wealth: $22,000
2009 White Family Wealth: $100,000Full-Time Minimum Wage, Adjusted for Inflation
1968: $18,262
2004: $10,712
What do these numbers mean to you? Do the top 1% not have enough? Do the poor have too much?
Sickening.
Subscribe to:
Posts (Atom)
