Saturday, June 06, 2009

65 Years Later

President Obama's speech at Omaha Beach this morning on the 65th Anniversary of D-Day.
"It was unknowable then, but so much of the progress that would define the 20th century, on both sides of the Atlantic, came down to the battle for a slice of beach only six miles long and two miles wide."

Sanchez Slams O"Reilly

CNN's Rick Sanchez taking Bill O'Reilly to the toolshed for lying about CNN's coverage of an Army recruiter shooting, and to a bigger degree, O'Reilly's bogus claim of a liberal media bias.
SANCHEZ: Bill O’Reilly says he only saw it once. And since he only saw it once, well then, that must be the truth. It doesn’t matter what really happened, it doesn’t matter what the record shows. All that matters is what Bill thinks he saw.
Will Bill O be sending a stalker to get back at Sanchez?



Source: ThinkProgress

Friday, June 05, 2009

Obama's Plausible Middle East Solution

Chuck Todd, Jim Maceda and Chris Matthews discuss Obama's Cairo speech on Hardball. Respect, humility and honor is what works in the Arab streets and the Muslim world.
"One of the best speeches I've ever heard" -- Matthews

"Obama didn't sound like a US President, at all, but more like an enlightened regional leader" -- Jim Maceda, NBC News - London
And if we are going to have any lasting effect in that region, that is the way we need to lead. We need partners. The heavy lifting has begun.


Source: MSNBC

100 Best Movie Lines In 200 Seconds

The Top 100 Movie Lines in 200 seconds.

Missing Notables: Spinal Tap, "Hello, Cleveland!", Stripes, "that's the fact, Jack", Swingers, "You don't know how money you are" and Fast Times At Ridgemont High, "You dick!".

Enjoy the weekend.

Stem Cells Curing The Blind

Certain people on the Right need to recognize real miracles:
Researchers in Australia have come up with an outwardly simple but incredibly ingenious way of curing blindness caused by corneal damage: Take everyday contact lenses, already used by millions, and infuse them with a patient's own stem cells. After wearing them for about 2 weeks, test subjects reported a seemingly miraculous restoration of sight.
Slap a price tag on it and away we go. It's the FDA American Way.



Source: PopSci

Labour Suffers Massive Losses In UK Elections

Just as America is stepping forward, the UK is stepping backwards.
"The Conservative Party is on course for sweeping gains across England as the local election results point towards meltdown for Labour.

Although most of the county councils have yet to declare, early results show the Conservatives taking dozens of seats from Labour and seizing control of two county councils in the Liberal Democrats’ stronghold in the South West."
All those Labour Ministers resigning amid scandals right before elections did not help. PM Gordon Brown must be feeling quite lonely about now.

Interesting to see a country go through elections that don't take 2 years of campaigning like in America.

Source: The Times

Lindsay Graham: Breaking Laws In Fear Is OK

This is what a coward, who only cares about elections, sounds like:
"The reason I don’t want to go back any more than we have already done is because I know what happened. Out of fear, we overreacted. … They took a view of the law that I think was aggressive, and I would not have approached it that way. Right after 9/11, we all thought we were going to be hit again. So as we go back and try to hold people criminally liable. I think we’re doing a lot of damage to the country, because their mistakes were not criminal mistakes. They were mistakes made out of fear,"
- Lindsey Graham.
Apparently for Graham, if you approve something that is “clearly illegal,” it’s not “a criminal mistake” — so long as you are acting out of fear. And since most crimes are done out of fear, he really has narrowed it down.

And when you look at the Abu Ghraib photos, who is afraid of who?

It makes the "Twinkies defense" sound like legal genius. Does he have any case law to support his assertion? Graham was a JAG lawyer, but it seems he wants to take a mulligan for years of post-9/11 behavior. Is there an on/off switch for following the law?

Why does he think the country will implode, as if we are weaklings who can't handle the truth, if we investigate these crimes? He admits, "I know what happened". What an utter scumbag. As if his pampered ass could deal with the most remote inconvenience.

We are 300 million strong. We can handle it.

Source: ThinkProgress

The Torture Apologia Chart

Great article by Batocchio with charts explaining the contorted logic of torture apologist:
We did not torture; waterboarding is not torture; even if it is torture, it was legal; even if it was illegal, it was necessary; even if it was unnecessary, it was not our fault.
Click on the image to see his large chart detailing all the excuses thrown out to justify what is at its core, a known illegal act.



Source: Vagabond Scholar

Liz Cheney Is An Analyst?

Why is Liz Cheney on TV?

She was a witness to the last Administration's horrendous record.

Now she is employed as an analyst? She is a daughter, not the gay one who was not allowed on stage at the 2004 RNC with the rest of the Cheney clan, of the person responsible for every wrong move we have made in the past 8 years and who's government credentials wreak of nepotism. She is the personification of bias and subjective thinking.

She is the definitive arbitrary conservative, hypocritically blasting Obama for engaging the Middle East through dialog to bring peace to the region, vis a vis yesterday's Cairo speech, when it was the "goal" of the Iraq invasion and Bush Doctrine to do the same exact thing, but with bombs, death to thousands of civilians, mass destruction of the region and an extreme loathsome, disinterest in the complexities of the Muslim world.

Please, can you get someone else.

Thursday, June 04, 2009

Geezah in Giza



Source: Reality Chex

Fear Of Humility

The biggest problem President Obama has with Republicans and Conservatives is their constant misinterpretation and distortion of his humility.

Unless you are brow-beating your base with "we are the best country in the world", "we are #1", "we are exceptional", "the rest of the world should be lucky to have us around", and all the other baseless claims of the untraveled and unenlightened, they see you as weak and apologetic.

Even if you were the best at something, there is no need to keep on repeating. It's juvenile. Insecure about something?

And let's face it, if it's a politician telling you, you know you have to take it with a grain of salt.

Obama has the reigns of a powerful world power, if not the biggest most powerful country in the world. Why does he have to keep on repeating that fact when in foreign countries?

It is the weakest of intellectuals that fear the humility of Obama. "Speak softly and carry a big stick" was Teddy Roosevelt's motto. Seeing how far war and the fake cowboy poseur has gotten us, it's about time we learn from those mistakes and speak in a way the rest of the world wants to listen to.

What Socialism Really Looks Like

This is the threat of socialism that Rush, Hannity, O'Reilly and the rest of the Right Wing echo chamber have their knickers in a knot about in relative terms since Obama took office.

All their fear over absolute nothing. The increase is almost not worth mentioning, yet it's a Republican talking point brought up at every chance.



Conor Clarke
at The Atlantic writes:
"There is a serious discussion to be had here, and I think Jon Henke is having it: Socialism, like farenheit, comes in degrees. Sure, a government that nationalizes GM is "more socialist" than one that does not, even if it doesn't mean we're living "under socialism." But differences of degree shouldn't obscure differences of kind, and as Tim Fernholz says, "it's clear that putting the government in charge of private production is not the Obama administration's guiding philosophy."

If it were, 99.79% of the American corporate assets that existed at the start of the Obama administration would not remain in private hands. The differences of degree are so small that they aren't worth mentioning. And yet, somehow, they keep getting mentioned."
Source: Oliver Willis

The Reviews Are In



New York Times: "The president delivered a sweeping message that was forceful and, at times, scolding as he promoted democracy..."

Washington Post: "The speech at times had the feel of a history lesson as Obama listed the accomplishments of Muslims in America..."

Wall Street Journal: "Obama, in a major speech, called for a new beginning between the U.S. and Muslims."

"Not My Recollection"

"Who is that gay marriage lovin', Iraq/Al Qaeda connection debunking, Left Wing press schmoozing, oh my god...."

It's Bizarro Cheney! But Dick Cheney redeems himself as true evil, claiming Richard Clarke missed 9/11 despite numerous memos, reports and meetings on record to the contrary. Cheney shrugs, "That's not my recollection" and "I didn't read his book". The moment that epitomizes everything wrong with Dick Cheney.

Not reading reports? Wars, trillions in debt, lives lost, torture policies. Thanks.
"That’s a good one, Mr. Cheney!Stewart chortled, mocking the Nation Press Club audience’s response. “I guess you never read the memos either … and then we went to war in Iraq because of bad intelligence distributed in your behest … and then we started torturing people. Good times!


The Daily Show With Jon StewartM - Th 11p / 10c
Dick (Uncut)
thedailyshow.com
Daily Show
Full Episodes
Political HumorEconomic Crisis


Source:

Bush's Record For Losing Jobs Peaking

Another end to a Bush era legacy:
"The number of people on the unemployment insurance rolls fell slightly last week for the first time in 20 weeks, while the tally of new jobless claims also dipped, the government said Thursday."
But still, the residue from Bush and his "spend and borrow, two Wars-at-a-time, cut taxes for the rich and deregulate and not investigate economic prowess" is still huge.
"The total jobless benefit rolls fell by 15,000 to 6.7 million" and unemployment, a lagging indicator, "will rise to 9.2 percent".
A very small step in the right direction after 8 years in the wrong direction.

Source: NYT

For The Hawks

The quote form Obama's speech should relieve some hawks:
"I am aware that some question or justify the events of 9/11. But let us be clear: al Qaeda killed nearly 3,000 people on that day. The victims were innocent men, women and children from America and many other nations who had done nothing to harm anybody. And yet Al Qaeda chose to ruthlessly murder these people, claimed credit for the attack, and even now states their determination to kill on a massive scale. They have affiliates in many countries and are trying to expand their reach. These are not opinions to be debated; these are facts to be dealt with."
Not shying away from the tough topics.

Source: The Daily Dish

A Reaction

"I challenge any Arab leader to go to the U.S. or the West and quote the Bible like Obama quoted the Quran." — Rabah al-Mutawa, a Saudi woman in Riyadh.

More reactions at the link below.

Source: TPM

A New Beginning: Obama In Cairo

Obama's speech today in Cairo.

No other figure in global politics could have done this.

Wednesday, June 03, 2009

Newt = Idiot

As per my last article, human fence post Newt Gingrich tweeted:
"… waterboarding is not torture. Waterboarding has been routinely used to train American pilots in the military to understand what interrogation techniques they might encounter."
So if a government does it to it's own elite, highly-specialized, handpicked military, it is not illegal torture across the board.

So all a foreign country has to do is torture their own military in training conditions, then they can do whatever they want to our troops. Better yet, they can do it to our innocent civilians. 183 times.

Great logic, Newt. Those who follow you should be neutered and spayed.

Fisking Newt. It's SO Easy

via John Schwenkler:
How Stupid Do They Think We Are?

Pretty stupid, apparently. I’m sure that this line of “thought” has been picked apart plenty of times in the anti-torture blogosphere, but Newt deserves a fisking of his own:

Newt tweeted: "… waterboarding is not torture. Waterboarding has been routinely used to train American pilots in the military to understand what interrogation techniques they might encounter."

By extension:

* Having sex with a woman is not raping her. Sex is routinely had between men and women as an expression of love and a means to pleasure and procreation.
* Punching a man in the face is not assaulting him. Men routinely punch one another in the face in the boxing ring as a test of athletic prowess.
* Driving 75 miles an hour on a residential street is not speeding. Cars routinely drive 75 miles an hour or more on the highway.
Equating SERE training with drowning civilians. Keep digging that hole, Newt.

Source: American Conservative

Olbermann: Cheney Versus Cheney

"He who controls the past, controls the future" -- George Orwell.

War Criminal In-Waiting Dick "Chatty Cathy" Cheney trying to re-invent himself. Olbermann not letting him.

I like the way Cheney refers to things he made up as "there had been reporting on", as in the connection between 9/11 and Iraq and Mohammad Atta meeting Al Qaeda officials, that now show no evidence. Ever.

Funny how those "stories" that were not borne out were spread like facts and used to distort reality back in 2001 and 2002.



Source: MSNBC

Cheney's House Of Cards

Interesting piece in the Washington Post on Dick Cheney's role in leading and "selling" torture in briefings to Congress and the CIA's dubious lack of admitting he was in those meetings.

Greg Sargent points out:
"The story reports that Cheney personally oversaw four or more briefings of members of congress about the torture program as part of an aggressive campaign in 2005 to maintain support for the use of torture.

But here’s the thing: The CIA documents that Republicans have widely cited as proof that Nancy Pelosi lied about what she knew didn’t mention Cheney’s presence at these briefings. Instead, as WaPo notes, the docs said that the info about who oversaw those particular briefings was “not available.”

Pelosi was broadly pilloried by Republicans and neutral observers for saying the CIA lied. Yet here’s yet more evidence that the CIA’s documents were incomplete at best and willfully misleading at worst."
Why the cover-up of Cheney's role? CIA created inaccurate notes? Seeing that Cheney was there for the sole purpose of pushing his [made-up] side of the story, funny to say his attendance was "not available". What else is not available?

The dots are being connected. Cheney's world of propaganda is coming undone.

Source: The Plum Line

Reality Check: Whose Ticking Time Bombs?

The scenario is played out in the media: a terrorist in America plants a bomb, they need to get information from the suspect. They have wiretapped his phone and tracked his online communications. They have monitored where he worships and back-checked his religious cohorts and their networks. Their reputation for extremism is not new. The threats of violence have been going on for years. They want to change policy through fear and are anti-Government.

The "ticking time bomb" we've been hearing about is a guy from Kansas who worships at an Evangelical Church. Go figure.

Lameness Lookout

With Obama in the Middle East, how long before the Republicans try to exploit a picture of him doing something traditional to incite their xenophobic base? Maybe holding hands with Saudi King Abdullah or bowing, as per local custom? Maybe wearing something exotic?

Always trying to link him to being a Muslim. Lame. Then they will spin his popularity overseas as a negative. Even lamer.

Tuesday, June 02, 2009

Presidential NBA Finals Prediction

President Obama picks the LA Lakers in six games.

He picked North Carolina in the NCAAs so he is hot. I'm going longshot, betting against the Lakers because I can't stand them, going with the Orlando Magic in five.

Hardball: Right Wing vs Sotomayor

Why is Pat Buchanan on TV? MSNBC needs to get a better Conservative pundit.

Lawrence O'Donnell
nails Old Man Pat over and over again. After throwing the affirmative action red herring out there, Pat is asked who on the Supreme Court who has better academic record than Sotomayor? His answer: none.



Source: MSNBC

Cheney Backpeddles

Cheney on Fox yesterday regarding his claims the CIA declassified documents will prove unequivocally that torture worked:
Yes, but the way I would describe them is they have to do with the detainee program, the interrogation program. It’s not just waterboarding. It’s the interrogation program that we used for high-value detainees. There were two reports done that summarize what we learned from that program, and I think they provide a balanced view.”
What a general statement. Now anything found that is helpful falls in the same category as the medieval torture he condoned and promoted. One step forward, two steps back.

Greg Sargent points out:
"Bear with me here, because this is crucial. Cheney is carefully saying that the documents summarize what we learned from the overall interrogation program. Torture, of course, was only a component of that program. So he’s clearly saying that the docs summarize what was learned from a program that included non-torture techniques, too."
Obfuscation is Cheney's forte. Just like the meandering justification for the Iraq War, you'll see how much his torture claims change over the coming weeks. Another speech in front of a bunch of GOP rubes, another story.

Because Cheney was so off on the pre-war intel, he double-downed on torturing information out of any and every Iraqi he could find to get a connection that was never there. Imagine the questioning, "where is the WMD?" Ummm, what WMD?

Source: The Plum Line

Burger King And Politics Don't Mix

Why is this sign up at a Burger King franchise in Memphis? I know Tennessee is assbackwards, but I would think Corporate would have something to say about it.

"Home of the Whopper" indeed...



Source: ThinkProgress

Can You Leave The USA?

Beginning June 1, 2009, American travelers entering the U.S. by land, air or sea from Mexico, Canada, Bermuda or the Caribbean are required to carry a U.S. passport.

Considering 70% of Americas don't have passports, this will be interesting.

Asked yesterday in Toronto, while at a conference with Bill Clinton, what he felt about the new rule, "I'll be frank with you [moderator] Frank [McKenna], I don't know about the passport issue," George Bush told the crowd of 6,000.

It was part of the Bush Administration's homeland security policy. Not reading has it's problems.

Source: Reason Magazine

Sotomayor: GOP Slurs vs. The Facts

via Glenn Greenwald:

A Sonia Sotomayor ruling from 2002, Pappas v Giuliani, where she dissented in favor of a racist white NYPD cop over 1st Amendment Rights:
The facts of Pappas are simple. The plaintiff was a white employee of the New York City Police Department -- working in a clerical position in information management -- when he was fired for having sent blatantly racist and anti-Semitic replies in response to charity requests he received in the mail. Pappas admitted doing it, and said he did it to protest the charity requests. The NYPD fired him for having sent the replies on the ground that it did not want racist employees. He sued the NYPD, alleging that his First Amendment rights were violated by the firing, because he was clearly fired due to the content of the political views he expressed.

The district court judge dismissed Pappas' case, finding that the NYPD had a legitimate need to exclude racists from its employ, a need which outweighed Pappas' First Amendment rights. On appeal, two of the three judges on the Second Circuit panel agreed with that ruling and dismissed Pappas' case. But not Sotomayor. She wrote a dissent emphasizing the strong First Amendment interests of Pappas' that were being violated -- however contemptible it was, it was pure political expression -- and she argued that it he was entitled to a jury trial to decide if the NYPD, under Supeme Court precedent, had any right to fire him for it.
Will this have any effect on the slurs thrown at her by Newt, Rush, Pat Buchanan and the rest of the aging, scared white GOP?

Source: Salon

Apple Of His Eye

Photo of Stanley Dunham from 1944. Grandfather to Barack Obama.



Source: Reality Chex

Cheney Admits There Never Was A Connection

I bet the families of the 4,308 dead soldiers would like some "alone time" with the war-meister. Can someone please compile a video of the lies Dick Cheney said regarding this statement:
On the question of whether or not Iraq was involved in 9-11, there was never any evidence to prove that. [There was] “some reporting early on … but that was never borne out… [President] George [Bush] … did say and did testify that there was an ongoing relationship between al-Qaeda and Iraq, but no proof that Iraq was involved in 9-11.
-- Dick Cheney on Fox, June 1, 2009
It would take around 5 minutes. Cheney has been on TV the last 7 years, and at 2 RNC conventions, completely lying. There is plenty of tape out there. He was always alluding to a "smoking gun" scenario that would vindicate him.

There was never evidence of a connection, there was never evidence of WMD. There were plenty of people saying this before the war. This is not news. Why does admitting it now make it alright? I see he had to do it on Fox. What a coward.

Source: RawStory

More Like No-Choice

This boils down to controlling women. There are plenty of reasons to have access to abortions. No one wants to have one, they need one. This notion that it's like birth control and people have them all the time is ridiculous.

As seen by the scarcity of clinics and the amount of restrictions put in place, the women who do eventually have them seem to be in pretty bad situations. All the "culture of life" phonies forget about the life of the mother. This is a hard enough situation with some pious, sanctimonious misogynist who does not even know the details of the situation trying to influence you with violence.

It's called the right to privacy. Everyone gets it.
There are three states in the country that have only one abortion clinic [ND, SD, MS], Rachel Maddow reported on MSNBC last night. Others heavily restrict abortion, ban abortions in clinics or any facility that receives public funds, or ban abortion counseling or clinic recommendations. The effect, she explained, is that in 87% of all U.S. counties it is not possible to get an abortion. "Why bother making it illegal if you can just make it impossible to get?"
Dr. Susan Wicklund guests.



Source: HuffPo

Monday, June 01, 2009

Rebuff On Exceptionalism

LA Time's Automotive columnist Dan Neil on GM's bankruptcy:
"It's hard not to see GM's bankruptcy as a signal moment in a larger history. If mighty GM can fail, cannot also the United States? And the answer is, absolutely.

Any organization that fails to sufficiently safeguard its means of self-correction and reform, that forsakes long-term investment for short-term gain, that piles up debt year after year, will eventually fail, no matter how grand its history or noble its purpose."
The company's stark decline is "a rebuff of the notion of exceptionalism," notes Neil.

Exceptionalism is the neo-con code for "the US can do anything it wants" and was the mantra of the Bush Administration as they wantonly drove the 200+ year-old "US of A" brand into the ground.

Fake patriotism by inferior undisciplined conservative politicians used to mask power grabs and Constitutional abuses is not "exceptional".

I'm all for civic pride. Where you are from is a big part of who you are. Don't just assume you are better than everyone else when it was those before you who did all the hard work and you are currently, by your own hubris and lack of curiosity, the dimmest bulb in the bunch.

Source: Slate

Quote of the Day: Bill Maher

Regarding our obsession:
"Americans are not the greatest people in the world. Politicians always tell us we are, and that's how you know it's a lie."
-- Bill Maher
Being #1 or the best is all relative. Until you have been other places, don't tell me how great things are.

Napolitano Report On Right Wing Extremism Holds True

How does that April report by Homeland Security Secretary Janet Napolitano about right-wing extremists look now?
"The Department of Homeland Security is warning law enforcement officials about a rise in "rightwing extremist activity," saying the economic recession, the election of America's first black president and the return of a few disgruntled war veterans could swell the ranks of white-power militias.

It may include groups and individuals that are dedicated to a single-issue, such as opposition to abortion or immigration," the warning says."
Remember the Right Wingers were calling on her to resign.

Source: Washington "Owned by the Moonies" Times

US Sleeper Cells

When the lunatics on the Right lose power, they hit the panic button. The world is ending in a socialist gay marriage nightmare. When the anti-abortion movement loses power, their most extreme elements appear to move to the fore and take control.

Here's the facts:
"During the entire Bush administration, from 2000-2008 there were no murders.

During the Clinton era, between 1994-2000 there were 6 abortion providers and clinic staff murdered, and 17 attempted murders of abortion providers. There were 12 bombings or arsons during the Clinton years.

During the Bush administration, not only were there no murders, there were no attempted murders. There was one clinic bombing during the Bush years.

One can only conclude that like terrorist sleeper cells, these extremists have now been set in motion. Indeed the evidence is already there. The chatter, the threats, the hate-filled rhetoric are abundant.

In the last year of the Bush administration there were 396 harassing calls to abortion clinics. In just the first four months of the Obama administration that number has jumped to 1401."
This is what domestic terror looks like. This is what bullying women looks like.

Source: HuffPo

Bruno's Ass Lands On Eminem's Face

UPDATE: It was staged.

Bruno's ass-sha [sp] crash lands right on FEMinem Eminem's face at the MTV Movie Awards. Too funny. Eminem and his crew storm out in a hissy fit.

Sacha Baron Cohen is still my hero.

Sunday, May 31, 2009

The Lost Soul Of Conservatism

Kevin Drum poses a great question: The nomination of Sonia Sotomayor to the Supreme Court raises a question: Who will win the battle for the conservative soul?

In the kiddie end of the intellectual pool we have:
Newt Gingrich: "White man racist nominee would be forced to withdraw. Latina woman racist should also withdraw."
Rush Limbaugh: "How can a party get behind such a candidate? That's what would be asked if somebody were foolish enough to nominate David Duke or pick somebody even less offensive."
Tom Tancredo: "She’s a member! She’s a member of La Raza!"
Matthew J. Franck: "Is she still, and how much of La Raza's politics does she make her own?"
Michael Goldfarb: "Does anyone dispute that Sotomayor has been the recipient of preferential treatment for most of her life?"
Bill Bennett: "Did she get into Princeton on affirmative action, one wonders."
G. Gordon Liddy: "Let's hope that the key conferences aren't when she's menstruating or something, or just before she's going to menstruate."
And then there are some Conservatives approaching puberty:
Peggy Noonan: "Newt Gingrich twitters that Judge Sotomayor is a racist. Does anyone believe that? He should rest his dancing thumbs, stop trying to position himself as the choice and voice of the base in 2012, and think."
Jon Cornyn: "This is not the kind of tone that any of us want to set when it comes to performing our constitutional responsibilities of advise and consent."
Julian Sanchez: "What we’re seeing here is people clinging to the belief that Sotomayor has to be some mediocrity who struck the ethnic jackpot, that whatever benefit she got from affirmative action must be vastly more significant than her own qualities, that she’s got to be a harpy boiling with hatred for whitey, however overwhelming the evidence against all these propositions is. This is really profoundly ugly."
Michael Steele: "I know that a lot of folks want to do the knee jerk you know let's start slammin' and rammin', but I think we really need to take a step back from this."
Charles Krauthammer: "What should a principled conservative do?....Nothing ad hominem. The argument should be elevated, respectful and entirely about judicial philosophy."
Can you say striving for mediocrity? Aiming low as to not disappoint?

Source: Kevin Drum

Trauma Defense A Lie

A reader points out the fallacy of "trauma defense" and it's legacy of manipulated and flawed reasoning:

1. Starting an unwinnable war against a tactic.
2. Curiously timed terror alerts.
3. Outing Valerie Plame.
4. Admitting that you don't think about Osama Bin Laden that much anymore.
5. Forgetting about the 2001 anthrax attacks (and the people who died in them) so you can say, "We haven't been attacked since 9/11."
6. Ignoring legal precedents on waterboarding.
7. Invading Iraq so that "the smoking gun won't be a mushroom cloud", watching American soldiers get killed in the occupation of that country, then making jokes when the weapons that would have produced the mushroom cloud don't appear.
8. Going to war against countries for what they MIGHT do.
9. Hyping the threat of Iran with even less evidence than what was used to justify invading Iraq.

Larisa Alexandrovna points out:
"Cheney was so traumatized that he met with his lawyer David Addington that very same day - while the fires raged and while the country was uncertain if the attacks had stopped - to find a way to blame these attacks on Iraq. That is not trauma. That is opportunism of the most cynical kind."
Source: Larisa Alexandrovna

The Goose And The Gander

For those caught up in the fake Sonia Sotomayor character issues:
"When a case comes before me involving, let's say, someone who is an immigrant -- and we get an awful lot of immigration cases and naturalization cases -- I can't help but think of my own ancestors, because it wasn't that long ago when they were in that position." -- Samuel Alito, at his Senate confirmation hearing, 2006
And this one:
"When I get a case about discrimination, I have to think about people in my own family who suffered discrimination because of their ethnic background or because of religion or because of gender. And I do take that into account." -- Same Guy, same place, same time
Talking Points Memo has the video that deflates all the GOP hysteria:



Source: Reality Chex

Temporary Insanity Defense Used For Years

Richard Clarke, former chief counter-terrorism adviser on the U.S. National Security Council, is sick and tired of the "White House 9/11 trauma defense" used by Cheney and Condi Rice to explain every bad decision they made for years. Clarke rebukes their "you had to be there" excuse, because he was there:
"[L]istening to Cheney and Rice, it seems that they want to be excused for the measures they authorized after the attacks on the grounds that 9/11 was traumatic.... I have little sympathy for this argument. Yes, we went for days with little sleep, and we all assumed that more attacks were coming. But the decisions that Bush officials made in the following months and years -- on Iraq, on detentions, on interrogations, on wiretapping -- were not appropriate. Careful analysis could have replaced the impulse to break all the rules, even more so because the Sept. 11 attacks, though horrifying, should not have surprised senior officials. Cheney's admission that 9/11 caused him to reassess the threats to the nation only underscores how, for months, top officials had ignored warnings from the CIA and the NSC staff that urgent action was needed to preempt a major al-Qaeda attack.

Thus, when Bush's inner circle first really came to grips with the threat of terrorism, they did so in a state of shock -- a bad state in which to develop a coherent response. Fearful of new attacks, they authorized the most extreme measures available, without assessing whether they were really a good idea. [...]

Dick Cheney and Condoleezza Rice may have been surprised by the attacks of Sept. 11, 2001 -- but it was because they had not listened. And their surprise led them to adopt extreme counterterrorism techniques -- but it was because they rejected, without analysis, the tactics the Clinton administration had used. The measures they uncritically adopted, which they simply assumed were the best available, were in fact unnecessary and counterproductive."
The Washington Monthly points out:
As Clarke noted, folks like Cheney and Rice want to emphasize the "trauma defense" to rationalize wrongdoing. But in the next breath, these same top officials say every decision they made was sound, legal, justified.
Maybe you can panic for 48 hours, 72 hours. The notion that the shock and psychological trauma of 9/11 excuses actions taken months or years later is just asinine.

The fact is, the Bush Administration did not listen to anyone prior to 9/11, demoting Clarke from a cabinet-level position proves this. They demoted the top counter-terrorism expert! Then after 9/11, the Bush Administration concocted WMD fables, discounted UN inspector Hans Blix, put an intellectual pygmy like Rumsfeld in charge of everything and pretty much told the world to eff-off.

The coward dies a thousand deaths. The hero dies just once.

Source: The Washington Monthly